Comments on: What Enterprise SRM Isn’t http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/ Branding in the age of social media. Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:04:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Posts about Viral Marketing as of January 31, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-269 Posts about Viral Marketing as of January 31, 2009 | The Lessnau Lounge Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:43:28 +0000 http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=294#comment-269 [...] can launch your personal articles for other sites content, newsletters, blogs, information base What Enterprise SRM Isn’t - scalableintimacy.com 01/30/2009 Saw this in today’s MediaPost: Appirio-facebookPersonal [...] [...] can launch your personal articles for other sites content, newsletters, blogs, information base What Enterprise SRM Isn’t – scalableintimacy.com 01/30/2009 Saw this in today’s MediaPost: Appirio-facebookPersonal [...]

]]> By: Steve G. http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Steve G. Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:22:54 +0000 http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=294#comment-255 Two words: Facebook Beacon. Tara reminded me of it when she used the word "stalker" in her comment from the previous post. Beacon didn't last a month. In a way, Beacon was a first attempt at Enterprise SRM with the "Enterprise" being the Facebook constituency. I really like your idea. My biggest concerns are the privacy/cross the line issues brought up in this post and by commenters in the previous post and being able to filter out the large volume of white noise in the world of social media. Two words: Facebook Beacon. Tara reminded me of it when she used the word "stalker" in her comment from the previous post. Beacon didn't last a month.

In a way, Beacon was a first attempt at Enterprise SRM with the "Enterprise" being the Facebook constituency.

I really like your idea. My biggest concerns are the privacy/cross the line issues brought up in this post and by commenters in the previous post and being able to filter out the large volume of white noise in the world of social media.

]]> By: Steve G. http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6490 Steve G. Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:22:00 +0000 http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=294#comment-6490 Two words: Facebook Beacon. Tara reminded me of it when she used the word "stalker" in her comment from the previous post. Beacon didn't last a month. In a way, Beacon was a first attempt at Enterprise SRM with the "Enterprise" being the Facebook constituency. I really like your idea. My biggest concerns are the privacy/cross the line issues brought up in this post and by commenters in the previous post and being able to filter out the large volume of white noise in the world of social media. Two words: Facebook Beacon. Tara reminded me of it when she used the word "stalker" in her comment from the previous post. Beacon didn't last a month.

In a way, Beacon was a first attempt at Enterprise SRM with the "Enterprise" being the Facebook constituency.

I really like your idea. My biggest concerns are the privacy/cross the line issues brought up in this post and by commenters in the previous post and being able to filter out the large volume of white noise in the world of social media.

]]> By: laurent http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-253 laurent Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:58:19 +0000 http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=294#comment-253 Indeed, points out to a nice 'close to privacy' issue. On the web, there's no more delete button. With the social web, we leave drops of blood and sharks will follow them to reach us. Interestingly enough, I think those who will try to abuse it will be discovered at some point and face the risk of having someone do what you just did: calling those practices hell. And because the social web uses technology more efficient (faster) than any companies, others will call them hell and they will have to stop. In this new internet world, we need stronger ethics and company that forget about that will remember I think. Indeed, points out to a nice 'close to privacy' issue. On the web, there's no more delete button. With the social web, we leave drops of blood and sharks will follow them to reach us. Interestingly enough, I think those who will try to abuse it will be discovered at some point and face the risk of having someone do what you just did: calling those practices hell. And because the social web uses technology more efficient (faster) than any companies, others will call them hell and they will have to stop. In this new internet world, we need stronger ethics and company that forget about that will remember I think.

]]> By: laurent http://scalableintimacy.com/what-enterprise-srm-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-6489 laurent Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:58:00 +0000 http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=294#comment-6489 Indeed, points out to a nice 'close to privacy' issue. On the web, there's no more delete button. With the social web, we leave drops of blood and sharks will follow them to reach us. Interestingly enough, I think those who will try to abuse it will be discovered at some point and face the risk of having someone do what you just did: calling those practices hell. And because the social web uses technology more efficient (faster) than any companies, others will call them hell and they will have to stop. In this new internet world, we need stronger ethics and company that forget about that will remember I think. Indeed, points out to a nice 'close to privacy' issue. On the web, there's no more delete button. With the social web, we leave drops of blood and sharks will follow them to reach us. Interestingly enough, I think those who will try to abuse it will be discovered at some point and face the risk of having someone do what you just did: calling those practices hell. And because the social web uses technology more efficient (faster) than any companies, others will call them hell and they will have to stop. In this new internet world, we need stronger ethics and company that forget about that will remember I think.

]]>