<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toward an Enterprise SRM Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/</link>
	<description>Branding in the age of social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the end, it&#8217;s about activation. &#124; Scalable Intimacy</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>In the end, it&#8217;s about activation. &#124; Scalable Intimacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-800</guid>
		<description>[...] posted a while back on the important distinctions among Monitoring, Participation, and Activation. Short version: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted a while back on the important distinctions among Monitoring, Participation, and Activation. Short version: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Needs Enterprise SRM? &#124; Scalable Intimacy</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Needs Enterprise SRM? &#124; Scalable Intimacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-316</guid>
		<description>[...] (This post is the third in a series defining &#8220;enterprise social relationship management&#8221; that starts here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (This post is the third in a series defining &#8220;enterprise social relationship management&#8221; that starts here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Enterprise SRM? &#124; Scalable Intimacy</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Enterprise SRM? &#124; Scalable Intimacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] (This post is the the second in a series that starts here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (This post is the the second in a series that starts here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Waggoner</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Waggoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
 
Thanks for the mention of MightyBrand.  It sounds like we&#039;re thinking along very similar lines and I&#039;ll be excited to hear what you think of the features and solutions we&#039;ll be rolling out over the next couple months.  Looking forward to the rest of the posts in this little series... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, </p>
<p>Thanks for the mention of MightyBrand.  It sounds like we&#039;re thinking along very similar lines and I&#039;ll be excited to hear what you think of the features and solutions we&#039;ll be rolling out over the next couple months.  Looking forward to the rest of the posts in this little series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Waggoner</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Waggoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
 
Thanks for the mention of MightyBrand.  It sounds like we&#039;re thinking along very similar lines and I&#039;ll be excited to hear what you think of the features and solutions we&#039;ll be rolling out over the next couple months.  Looking forward to the rest of the posts in this little series...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, </p>
<p>Thanks for the mention of MightyBrand.  It sounds like we&#039;re thinking along very similar lines and I&#039;ll be excited to hear what you think of the features and solutions we&#039;ll be rolling out over the next couple months.  Looking forward to the rest of the posts in this little series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Happe</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Happe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike - 
 
I actually see true enterprise social software going well beyond just Monitor, Participate, &amp; Activate - those are primarily marketing-oriented constructs (although internal marketing can be served by them as well).  I think it also needs to extend into accounting, resource management &amp; project management systems or it will still only go part of the way (because of it&#039;s cross functional nature mentioned by Tom). But you are right - I think the market needs to think differently about what enterprise social software is. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8211; </p>
<p>I actually see true enterprise social software going well beyond just Monitor, Participate, &amp; Activate &#8211; those are primarily marketing-oriented constructs (although internal marketing can be served by them as well).  I think it also needs to extend into accounting, resource management &amp; project management systems or it will still only go part of the way (because of it&#039;s cross functional nature mentioned by Tom). But you are right &#8211; I think the market needs to think differently about what enterprise social software is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Happe</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Happe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike - 
 
I actually see true enterprise social software going well beyond just Monitor, Participate, &amp; Activate - those are primarily marketing-oriented constructs (although internal marketing can be served by them as well).  I think it also needs to extend into accounting, resource management &amp; project management systems or it will still only go part of the way (because of it&#039;s cross functional nature mentioned by Tom). But you are right - I think the market needs to think differently about what enterprise social software is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8211; </p>
<p>I actually see true enterprise social software going well beyond just Monitor, Participate, &amp; Activate &#8211; those are primarily marketing-oriented constructs (although internal marketing can be served by them as well).  I think it also needs to extend into accounting, resource management &amp; project management systems or it will still only go part of the way (because of it&#039;s cross functional nature mentioned by Tom). But you are right &#8211; I think the market needs to think differently about what enterprise social software is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troiano</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Troiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-162</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent point, Marty. I have some pretty specific ideas on where this all leads and look forward to hearing what others think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent point, Marty. I have some pretty specific ideas on where this all leads and look forward to hearing what others think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troiano</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>Troiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent point, Marty. I have some pretty specific ideas on where this all leads and look forward to hearing what others think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent point, Marty. I have some pretty specific ideas on where this all leads and look forward to hearing what others think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toward an Enterprise SRM Platform &#124; Scalable Intimacy &#124; crmfreeware.com</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/toward-an-enterprise-srm-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Toward an Enterprise SRM Platform &#124; Scalable Intimacy &#124; crmfreeware.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=241#comment-161</guid>
		<description>[...] Toward an Enterprise SRM Platform &#124; Scalable Intimacy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Toward an Enterprise SRM Platform | Scalable Intimacy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

