The Price of Intimacy

by Michael Troiano on February 25, 2009

bachelor-mesnick41A business school sage once advised me, or more properly a roomful of Type-A hyper-achievers with one foot out the door, to seek balance in our lives. “Measure your successes by what you sacrifice to achieve them,” he said. It was good advice then, and it’s stuck with me.

I was reminded of this as The Bachelor (that’s right, I watch it) barrels toward another tear-jerking finale. As my personal favorite Jillian lamented in her departing limo, “You have to take a chance, to put yourself out there, to have a shot at something great.”

You go, girl. <sniff>

So it is with social media.

There’s a lot of value to be had by embracing this new medium, or at a minimum the potential for a lot of value. Much of that value derives from the dialog it enables between users and brands. That dialogue creates the potential for intimacy, in a way no broadcast medium can.

But there is a price to be paid for this intimacy, as Jillian well knows. You have to take a risk. You have to put yourself out there, and be willing to get hurt. You have to give up some control.

Marketing is about managing perception.

At some level marketing has always been about changing what large numbers of anonymous people think, feel, or do. In the culture of marketing, the ability to persuade has been the coin of the realm. We have been rewarded not to lie, really, but to manage perception in ways that serve our interests. Sometimes that’s meant limiting access to certain inconvenient truths about products, quality, service levels, competition, etc. Often it’s meant efforts to add perceived value by associating ordinary products with extraordinary advertising. Always it’s meant leveraging the bullhorn of mass media to promote our singular worldview.

Now along comes social media, with the promise of lower cost, higher impact communication. But while the benefits are unproven, the intangible costs are very concrete to marketers not exactly comfortable engaging the unwashed masses on an equal footing. This concern expresses itself in countless ways, here are just a few I’ve heard recently:

  • “Oh, if we open this up to customers, they’re just going to complain.”
  • “I’m sure we have some fans, I’m just not sure how many.”
  • “Our lawyers would never let us say that.”
  • “Well we can’t just let anyone say whatever they want. Can we?”
  • “But what if our competitors see this?”

Giving up control creates risks with which marketing people are neither familiar or comfortable. How do you get past them?

Social media marketing manages perception by revealing and responding to it.

First off, I don’t subscribe to some Utopian worldview that social media marketing isn’t marketing at all. The game is still to manage perception, folks, though with fewer degrees of freedom from the objective truth.

But is that such a bad thing? Is that really what we fear? Is THAT what’s holding us back?

The funny thing about objective truth is that it is what it is. And if you think about it, so much of the pain and hardship in business and in life is caused by distance from the objective truth – of ourselves, our relationships, our situations and our businesses.

If getting closer to that is the price of participation in social media, well that that’s really no price at all.

So buck up, Jillian. The truth is he’s going to marry the cheerleader or the ice queen, it’s not going to work out, and you’re going to be the next Bachelorette.

Choke on that, Daddy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Great post, interesting!

Great post, interesting!

I tend to think that companies will get the social media experience they deserve. For companies with a real customer focus, that care about the customer experience they provide, social media will open up new opportunities and hold much promise. But these companies are already listening to their customers and responding, though in other ways.

Not every company wants customer perception revealed and not every company wants to respond by improving customer experience. I’m sure we all know companies that have a separate, elite team dedicated to servicing their own senior executives. They know their customer experience isn’t up to snuff, and their response it to devise a way to hide that fact from themselves.

Yes, fear of the truth really is holding some companies back. For them, the gap between what they say about themselves in advertising and how their customers actually feel about them is frighteningly large.

I tend to think that companies will get the social media experience they deserve. For companies with a real customer focus, that care about the customer experience they provide, social media will open up new opportunities and hold much promise. But these companies are already listening to their customers and responding, though in other ways.

Not every company wants customer perception revealed and not every company wants to respond by improving customer experience. I’m sure we all know companies that have a separate, elite team dedicated to servicing their own senior executives. They know their customer experience isn’t up to snuff, and their response it to devise a way to hide that fact from themselves.

Yes, fear of the truth really is holding some companies back. For them, the gap between what they say about themselves in advertising and how their customers actually feel about them is frighteningly large.

I'm not convinced that traditional marketers simply have a tough time letting go of the old ways - although that is part the story. As a recent convert to social media marketing, I did initially find the risks associated with social media transparency a concern, but it took only a little digging and prodding for me to see the real value, and ultimately the light.

Most marketers are pragmatic. It's not that they just don't see the value or want to make the leap, its often that they can't SELL the value of it internally. Try telling a skeptical CEO that your going to"particpate on the web" to manage perception and drive leads--especially during a time when leads are more important than ever.

I believe the future of marketing for those companies that don't sell social media solutions will be a hodgepodge of "participating on the Web" and other more traditional marketing. At least for the time being. It's certainly a necessary step in the right direction. Thoughts?

I'm not convinced that traditional marketers simply have a tough time letting go of the old ways - although that is part the story. As a recent convert to social media marketing, I did initially find the risks associated with social media transparency a concern, but it took only a little digging and prodding for me to see the real value, and ultimately the light.

Most marketers are pragmatic. It's not that they just don't see the value or want to make the leap, its often that they can't SELL the value of it internally. Try telling a skeptical CEO that your going to"particpate on the web" to manage perception and drive leads--especially during a time when leads are more important than ever.

I believe the future of marketing for those companies that don't sell social media solutions will be a hodgepodge of "participating on the Web" and other more traditional marketing. At least for the time being. It's certainly a necessary step in the right direction. Thoughts?

You couldn't be more right about the need to manage perceptions and the hardship caused by distance from the objective truth.

Conversely, look at a company like Victoria Secret. Look at the perception they heavily manage with their stable of supermodels. What is their incentive to engage in "objective" truth? For them, I would think that the perception is far more necessary than any objective truth.

You couldn't be more right about the need to manage perceptions and the hardship caused by distance from the objective truth.

Conversely, look at a company like Victoria Secret. Look at the perception they heavily manage with their stable of supermodels. What is their incentive to engage in "objective" truth? For them, I would think that the perception is far more necessary than any objective truth.

Great post. It's pretty simple from my perspective but fantastically difficult to execute. Traditional marketers have a tough time letting go of 'what it used to be like' and need to realize that with the explosion of social media, people aren't fooled by traditional marketing BS. I'm a firm believer that openness and transparency is what people want. Look at social media companies, they don't do traditional marketing, they "participate on the web" and THAT is their marketing strategy.

To be short and sweet, put it out there, get feedback, adjust and rinse and repeat. It's more efficient and much more effective.

Great post. It's pretty simple from my perspective but fantastically difficult to execute. Traditional marketers have a tough time letting go of 'what it used to be like' and need to realize that with the explosion of social media, people aren't fooled by traditional marketing BS. I'm a firm believer that openness and transparency is what people want. Look at social media companies, they don't do traditional marketing, they "participate on the web" and THAT is their marketing strategy.

To be short and sweet, put it out there, get feedback, adjust and rinse and repeat. It's more efficient and much more effective.

Previous post:

Next post: