Social Relationship Management = SRM

by Michael Troiano on March 19, 2009

istock_000006385499xsmallIn prior posts I’ve discussed the concept of “Social Relationship Management,” or “SRM.”

After some iteration (and the help of Perry Hewitt,) I’ve come up with an explicit definition:

Social Relationship Management (SRM) - the processes a company uses to monitor, engage with, and activate the often large number of loose ties it maintains across open social networks. SRM software supports these processes; information about volume, sentiment, emergent and trending themes, and key influencers comprising the collective external response to a company’s brand, business, products, people, and actions can be collected, stored and accessed by employees across the enterprise. Typical SRM goals include building brand equity, increasing sales, improving customer service, informing product management decisions and focusing business strategy on opportunities for differentiation.

My definition is heavily influenced by Wikipedia’s consensus definition of SRM’s older cousin, CRM, from which it differs in some fundamental ways:

  • CRM is about managing a comparatively few relationships at the core of the business, not about managing a lot of relationships all around it.
  • The nature of CRM relationships is comparatively intense, not casual in the way most social relationships are.
  • Systems to manage CRM processes are all about comprehensive data collection and entry (anyone whose used Salesforce.com knows exactly what I mean here.) Systems to manage SRM process will be the opposite – accepting what voluntary participants share with it, and asking little or nothing else to add value.
  • Interaction via CRM systems is proscribed (e-mail, call, meeting…) whereas the interactions through the ever-growing list of social networks is variable and changing all the time.
  • The output of a CRM system tends to be centralized and hierarchical, while the output of an SRM system would tend to be distributed, and flat.

I think SRM will become at least as important to the enterprise as CRM. What do you think?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

Tara Kelly March 19, 2009 at 12:22 am

Excellent analysis in my opinion. So, is there any software out there that actually adheres?

Reply

Mike Troiano March 19, 2009 at 12:47 am

No, not that I've seen. Lots of point solutions, but no one that's trying to bring them together into a full featured platform.

Reply

Tara Kelly March 19, 2009 at 12:22 am

Excellent analysis in my opinion. So, is there any software out there that actually adheres?

Reply

Mike Troiano March 19, 2009 at 12:47 am

No, not that I've seen. Lots of point solutions, but no one that's trying to bring them together into a full featured platform.

Reply

laurent March 19, 2009 at 1:11 am

The question is whether SRM will exist on its own or will be an extension of CRM. Every CRM software vendors provide a platform for application development thus a potential for the integration of the social pieces. Oh and the integration of the social pieces has already started.
For exemple: Salesforce.com integrates Facebook profiles into customer records, while Lotus Notes shows the LinkedIn profile of an email sender.

Reply

laurent March 19, 2009 at 1:11 am

The question is whether SRM will exist on its own or will be an extension of CRM. Every CRM software vendors provide a platform for application development thus a potential for the integration of the social pieces. Oh and the integration of the social pieces has already started.
For exemple: Salesforce.com integrates Facebook profiles into customer records, while Lotus Notes shows the LinkedIn profile of an email sender.

Reply

Eric Gall March 19, 2009 at 6:27 pm

The holy grail will be encouraging SRM to funnel into CRM? i.e. to inspire those with whom we develop casual relationships via Social Media into becoming more engaged with our brand, either because they are already customers/users, or want to become so.

Reply

Eric Gall March 19, 2009 at 6:27 pm

The holy grail will be encouraging SRM to funnel into CRM? i.e. to inspire those with whom we develop casual relationships via Social Media into becoming more engaged with our brand, either because they are already customers/users, or want to become so.

Reply

David Beisel March 19, 2009 at 8:14 pm

Your definition sounds just like that – a definition… which does follow in the same vein as the Wikipedia entry. But the second paragraph (which you’ve written before) is still more descriptive – perhaps it’s more illuminating to restate it in the affirmative: SRM is about monitoring and engaging many light-touch relationships in an ever-changing distributed communication space.

Both the challenge and the opportunity for this software is that these interactions occur in disparate forums via disparate parts of an organization. Not only is there a need for functionality, but also synchronization.

Reply

David Beisel March 19, 2009 at 8:14 pm

Your definition sounds just like that – a definition… which does follow in the same vein as the Wikipedia entry. But the second paragraph (which you’ve written before) is still more descriptive – perhaps it’s more illuminating to restate it in the affirmative: SRM is about monitoring and engaging many light-touch relationships in an ever-changing distributed communication space.

Both the challenge and the opportunity for this software is that these interactions occur in disparate forums via disparate parts of an organization. Not only is there a need for functionality, but also synchronization.

Reply

A. Prem Kumar April 8, 2009 at 9:02 pm

I fail to understand, how exactly is this different from the goals of Social CRM or CRM 2.0 or what-you-gonna-call-it RM?

Also, I believe that CRM article on Wikipedia is a very very poorly written one. But alas! I am not that competent enough to clean it up either. :(

Reply

scorpfromhell April 8, 2009 at 9:02 pm

I fail to understand, how exactly is this different from the goals of Social CRM or CRM 2.0 or what-you-gonna-call-it RM?

Also, I believe that CRM article on Wikipedia is a very very poorly written one. But alas! I am not that competent enough to clean it up either. :(

Reply

Dan Martell November 12, 2009 at 5:37 pm

CRM = Customers, SRM = Social Connections.

If done right, social media will be the future of what people have been calling “Lead Nurturing”. It's a connection w/ someone (for a business – it's a lead or prospect) that someday may prove fruitful.

At http://www.flowtown.com we believe it should be about discovery. Providing insights into the connections – and deciding if you want to move the contact into a CRM.

my2cents.

Reply

Dan Martell November 12, 2009 at 5:47 pm

CRM = Customers, SRM = Social Connections.

If done right, social media will be the future of what people have been calling “Lead Nurturing”. It's a connection w/ someone (for a business – it's a lead or prospect) that someday may prove fruitful.

At http://www.flowtown.com we believe it should be about discovery. Providing insights into the connections – and deciding if you want to move the contact into a CRM.

my2cents.

Reply

alex888 December 13, 2009 at 10:19 pm

i work for a company that actually build similar software. A quick video is at http://bit.ly/8cIe9C. The product is described at http://bit.ly/5m4v3y.

Reply

alex December 13, 2009 at 10:20 pm

i work for a company that actually build similar software. A quick video is at http://bit.ly/8cIe9C. The product is described at http://bit.ly/5m4v3y.

Reply

alex888 December 14, 2009 at 3:19 am

i work for a company that actually build similar software. A quick video is at http://bit.ly/8cIe9C. The product is described at http://bit.ly/5m4v3y.

Reply

alex December 14, 2009 at 3:20 am

i work for a company that actually build similar software. A quick video is at http://bit.ly/8cIe9C. The product is described at http://bit.ly/5m4v3y.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 6 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: