Scalable Intimacy and Politics

by Michael Troiano on March 31, 2010

Post image for Scalable Intimacy and Politics

I live in Sudbury, a dreamy little hamlet about 20 miles West of Boston. It’s very nice, we like it a lot.

Sudbury has the highest concentration of households with school-aged children of any town in Massachusetts, which makes for a very family-oriented town, and also puts a lot of focus on the quality of our schools. Each year the town sets a budget and struggles to live within it – like most towns, families, and people I know. When it can’t, the Town Fathers propose an “override,” meaning a right to raise taxes to cover expenses of the town over and above those that were budgeted.

Each year the proponents of this tax use the same slogan for this override: “Support Sudbury!” Each year they say that to maintain our first-class schools, fire and police, we need to reach into our pockets and give a little more for the team.

Since 1999 the good people of Sudbury have “Supported Sudbury,” and this well-intended philanthropy has led to a series of challenges for the town well documented in this video highlighting some rather daunting facts and figures.

Anyhoo… I’ve had just about enough of this. And I met a like-minded denizen of the town, Bob Haarde, who’d decided to run for Selectman, and do something about it.

I met Bob for dinner at the local hangout, and we talked about how I might be able to help his campaign through the addition of a social marketing program. I offered to help, but told Bob that in the end, the program would succeed or fail not based on my talents, but based on his willingness to contribute substantive content to the channel, and to engage with the people drawn to that content. I agreed to get him started, and he agreed to create and post 3 pieces of original content to the system in the next 72 hours. This was important since time was short… the election was a week and a half away.

That night at my kitchen table I created and customized accounts for him on Posterous and Twitter, connecting them to each other and to a Facebook Fan Page I created from within Bob’s own facebook account. I took the Posterous e-mail and sent it to him, with instructions to publish whatever he wanted to share with voters, described in a casual and personal way, along with whatever anecdotes he cared to share about the journey of a regular guy into his first elective office.

He began to do so, and after he’d added 3 or 4 posts I began following our fellow Sudbury-ites on Twitter, and sharing the page with my own local friends on Facebook. By the election this week – 10 days after they launched – we’d amassed 25 Twitter followers and 60 Facebook fans, collectively connected to hundreds more. The Posterous entries were being published to both channels, and being viewed natively between 50 and 100 times.

Bob Haarde is now Sudbury’s newest Selectman. He has the seeds of a coalition to deliver on his campaign promise (“Cut waste, not teachers.”), and a direct and ready channel to the network of local voters that got him elected.

And he won by 36 votes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I went with Posterous just because it was the easiest way for Bob to get his content in. Really more for the e-mail feature, and the ease of broadcasting into the open social nets.

Yes, that's the question. I think he'll stay engaged, and hope he does.

Kudos, I also used social media for my campaign last fall -- leading to a victory as a Newburyport city councilor.

I wonder why you opted to use Posterous and not a more Wordpress/Blogspot-looking blog. Is it so he could email new posts and not worry about the look of things? Is it also because of the assumption most people would subscribe by email?

Now the question is will he continue to use these tools now that he's elected... and will he be more social, or continue mainly broadcasting?

Mike, congratulations for his success. I like how it shows the power of social media; I'm sure these efforts got you at least the 37 votes needed. But what I like even more is that this shows how much better off we are when things are handled by local government, vs the state or federal government. (In Ireland there is no local government, only the federal, so we saw first hand this issue.)

Mike, congratulations on the success. This probably got him the 37 votes he needed to win. I like his promise about cutting waste (though it'll not help me as we live in Lexington.) Most of all, I love how it shows how important it is for government to be as local as possible; the residents of Sudbury were able to do what is needed to to cut waste, where as if this was decided on the state or the national level, the residents of Sudbury would have so much less control

Thanks for the info. The results are at:

http://www.sudbury.ma.us/services/Clerk/custom/...

Blanks: 45
Keller: 1,262
Haarde: 1,298

Not sure, Jamie. I wasn't that close to the rest of the campaign, but my sense is that he and his wife did a great job of it. Pretty sure there was only one Selectman seat up, the others were for School Committee and Parks and Rec.

Good for him. Now you just need to look at which followers voted in the election.

A few questions: What other voter outreach did he do? How many votes were cast for the office? Were two or one select board positions up for election?

Previous post:

Next post: