<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holland-Mark 2K10: Capital &#8220;M&#8221; Marketing in the Imperative Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/</link>
	<description>Branding in the age of social media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6198</guid>
		<description>Kewl, will say &quot;yo&quot; to Sass. Happy new year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kewl, will say &#8220;yo&#8221; to Sass. Happy new year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Troiano</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Troiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6197</guid>
		<description>Well said, Max.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In our conception the &quot;Product&quot; (capital &quot;P&quot; perhaps...) is all those things, not just the widget in the box. We&#039;ll need to be more specific about this when we talk with clients, knowing that is quite useful to us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - Enjoyed the last Cast of Dads. Give my best to Sass if you see him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Max.</p>
<p>In our conception the &#8220;Product&#8221; (capital &#8220;P&#8221; perhaps&#8230;) is all those things, not just the widget in the box. We&#39;ll need to be more specific about this when we talk with clients, knowing that is quite useful to us.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; Enjoyed the last Cast of Dads. Give my best to Sass if you see him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6196</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6196</guid>
		<description>Congrats on a good 2009. It&#039;s good to see a (former?) agency step back from the corporate masturbation business and into the truth business. Sounds a lot like the public relations business. I agree with your four points of: relevance; message clarity; communication consistency; and advocacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, when you say &quot;it will take “big-M” Marketing&quot;, I would push harder and suggest there is a need and opportunity to influence what the product becomes. Or influence which products receive investment and resourcing. Or influence how the sales team sells the products. Or how the channel partners sell the product. Or how it&#039;s distributed. Or how customer service upsells the product and reinstates value and cycles feedback to R&amp;D teams...and so on. The most effective (former) agencies will move upstream, beyond a completed product, to do this. Marketing must be built into the product and experience, from inception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on a good 2009. It&#39;s good to see a (former?) agency step back from the corporate masturbation business and into the truth business. Sounds a lot like the public relations business. I agree with your four points of: relevance; message clarity; communication consistency; and advocacy.</p>
<p>However, when you say &#8220;it will take “big-M” Marketing&#8221;, I would push harder and suggest there is a need and opportunity to influence what the product becomes. Or influence which products receive investment and resourcing. Or influence how the sales team sells the products. Or how the channel partners sell the product. Or how it&#39;s distributed. Or how customer service upsells the product and reinstates value and cycles feedback to R&#038;D teams&#8230;and so on. The most effective (former) agencies will move upstream, beyond a completed product, to do this. Marketing must be built into the product and experience, from inception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6191</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6191</guid>
		<description>Kewl, will say &quot;yo&quot; to Sass. Happy new year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kewl, will say &#8220;yo&#8221; to Sass. Happy new year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Troiano</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Troiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6190</guid>
		<description>Well said, Max.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In our conception the &quot;Product&quot; (capital &quot;P&quot; perhaps...) is all those things, not just the widget in the box. We&#039;ll need to be more specific about this when we talk with clients, knowing that is quite useful to us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - Enjoyed the last Cast of Dads. Give my best to Sass if you see him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Max.</p>
<p>In our conception the &#8220;Product&#8221; (capital &#8220;P&#8221; perhaps&#8230;) is all those things, not just the widget in the box. We&#39;ll need to be more specific about this when we talk with clients, knowing that is quite useful to us.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; Enjoyed the last Cast of Dads. Give my best to Sass if you see him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxkalehoff</title>
		<link>http://scalableintimacy.com/holland-mark-2k10-capital-m-marketing-in-the-imperative-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6189</link>
		<dc:creator>maxkalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalableintimacy.com/?p=782#comment-6189</guid>
		<description>Congrats on a good 2009. It&#039;s good to see a (former?) agency step back from the corporate masturbation business and into the truth business. Sounds a lot like the public relations business. I agree with your four points of: relevance; message clarity; communication consistency; and advocacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, when you say &quot;it will take “big-M” Marketing&quot;, I would push harder and suggest there is a need and opportunity to influence what the product becomes. Or influence which products receive investment and resourcing. Or influence how the sales team sells the products. Or how the channel partners sell the product. Or how it&#039;s distributed. Or how customer service upsells the product and reinstates value and cycles feedback to R&amp;D teams...and so on. The most effective (former) agencies will move upstream, beyond a completed product, to do this. Marketing must be built into the product and experience, from inception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on a good 2009. It&#39;s good to see a (former?) agency step back from the corporate masturbation business and into the truth business. Sounds a lot like the public relations business. I agree with your four points of: relevance; message clarity; communication consistency; and advocacy.</p>
<p>However, when you say &#8220;it will take “big-M” Marketing&#8221;, I would push harder and suggest there is a need and opportunity to influence what the product becomes. Or influence which products receive investment and resourcing. Or influence how the sales team sells the products. Or how the channel partners sell the product. Or how it&#39;s distributed. Or how customer service upsells the product and reinstates value and cycles feedback to R&#038;D teams&#8230;and so on. The most effective (former) agencies will move upstream, beyond a completed product, to do this. Marketing must be built into the product and experience, from inception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

